Archive for the ‘Yes and No’ Category

Yes and no.

September 17th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no.

July 25th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

A food edition Yes and no. I think Joe would appreciate the yes.

Yes and no.

July 5th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no.

June 22nd, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no (via @Chipez)

Yes and no

May 12th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

It’s been a while.
Yes and no.

Yes and no

March 28th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes (simply love this photography) and no.

Yes and no

February 12th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no (mainly because it wouldn’t work and the cat would ultimately turn on you and begin to plan your quick demise).

Yes

January 26th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Just yes.

[photopress:09.jpg,thumb,pp_image]

Yes and no

January 18th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no.

January 17th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no (and probably illegal)

January 16th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and No and probably illegal.

Yes and no

January 14th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and No.

January 13th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes (or yes) and no.

* it’s a subtle difference, but I would say significant.

Yes and no

January 7th, 2009, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no

December 30th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

Yes and No.

Yes and no

December 12th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no

November 29th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and No (and two things I saw on Wednesday)

November 27th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

Here are two things I came across on my Wednesday and very easily classify into one or the other.

Yes and NO (oh heck no).

Yes and no

November 20th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

Yes and no.

Yes and no

August 29th, 2008, posted in Yes and No

In a public art theme today, here’s your Yes and no**.

** while the “no” is very creative, it falls into the creepy realm. I gauge this by showing it to G. If he says “no,” then it’s a no.